Thread:Leboringjack/@comment-26074320-20160111160546/@comment-26930987-20160112144137

Leboringjack wrote: I must say - the page was not protected when I made the edit. There was no warning that only Layten could edit. My edit was in good faith, and all I was doing was adding a couple storms. It also feels silly to give me a warning over something that happened nigh-on-a-month ago. I'd forgotten that I even made an edit on that page. Thank you for reading. Jack, I'm kind of thinking that it is basic sense that if it doesn't say anything about "Free- Editing" then it's probably best not to edit it (unless you are fixing grammar or adding more categories to the page). Vandalism was a big problem with all the underage users, and it is not something we take lightly. If you wanted to add storms to the season, you could have left Layten a friendly message asking if you could help him with the season, this warning would have not been needed.

Sure, it was in good faith, and it wasn't a bad faith edit, but you did not ask permission of the author of the season. And not only that, but this is very similar to an excuse Cardozo would make.

We really couldn't issue the warning until now, because:

1: Layten was on break the whole time from that edit until this warning.

2: Chat was having difficulties (AKA someone crashed it)

3: We were not aware this happened until Layten told us just the other day.

Hopefully this answers all those questions...