Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27119188-20160926000506/@comment-11987506-20160926002207

Well, I guess it's time.

I want to remain neutral' on this choice, as I don't want to offend Layten, but I'll highlight several issues now:


 * When Layten was a bureaucrat before, he would promote lots of users without a community consensus or without Hype's permission.
 * Layten basically thinks that every single edit to his articles are "vandalism", while in reality, they're not.
 * Layten blocked several users before for unjust reasons, such as when he blocked RAMTurtle for a month(?) because he edited a few of his seasons.
 * Layten has frequently mentioned user rights, requesting bureaucrat rights twice, as Jd noted, and also wanted to make a "proposal", in order to regain rights.
 * When Layten was demoted, he would threaten multiple times to quit, and would also claim his demotions were "unfair", despite the fact those demotions were made both by the wiki staff, and via a community consensus, in which Layten himself said that "[demoting me to] nothing is not an option".
 * Layten literally acts like he's entitled to having rights, despite the fact that he barely uses them today.
 * Layten has also argued with former and current users of the wiki, to the point in which he requested an user to be blocked from a wiki, even banning the user at one point, without support from any users or the founder.
 * Layten has done several user rights requests after his demotion, with the majority of the wiki opposing it.

I would personally support this thread thanks to these issues, but I don't want to hurt Layten's feelings, despite I'm leaning towards support.