HHW:GOOD
On the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki, our community wants to show off its creations. As such, quality content on our wiki can be marked as a "good article", similar to Wikipedia in this regard. This is the page where articles are submitted for review and then voted on by the community. When voting, please follow the voting guidelines.
Should an article pass its vote, it will be marked with a {{Good article}} template similar to featured articles. The list of good articles can be found here, while an archive of all past submissions can be found here.
Requirements and criteria[]
- The submission vote must pass with a supermajority of at least 60% to be considered a good article.
- All articles submitted must follow the standards listed in the Manual of Style.
- For individual storm articles, the article must be at least 5,000 bytes in size.
- For season articles, the article must be at least 10,000 bytes in size.
- The article submitted cannot already be a featured article.
- Once you submit an article, you must wait at least a week before submitting another one. This is to prevent users from submitting articles too frequently.
Submitting an article should be formatted accordingly, with the article name and hyperlink in subheading 1 and voting in subheading 2. For example:
Article name
Voting
Each vote should be individually bulleted like this:
Support — (reasoning for vote) ~~~~
Oppose — (reasoning for vote) ~~~~
Neutral — (reasoning for vote) ~~~~
There is no specific order or organization regarding voting, unlike on requests for user rights. Once someone votes, please insert your vote below theirs as an individual bullet point. When done voting, please sign your posts with ~~~~, as this is your signature and will allow us to identify you and keep things organized.
Current submissions[]
Hurricane Flaas[]
Voting[]
- Strongly support — This is a very good article! It is well structured and the writing is really good. The use of tables and images really tie it together. Feels like I'm reading an official wikipedia article! Benji.bijey (talk) 10:53 UTC, September 28, 2025
- Support — Not too familiar with fictional basins, but this totally feels like an otherworldly wikipedia article. Highly detailed and well-written, there is no reason not to support. Great job on this! Foxthehurricane Sixty-Five (Talk🌀Contributions) 22:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Cyclone Linardos[]
Voting[]
- Support — This is an extremely well-written article, and just as Occluded said, portrays the landscapes of Crete and Cyprus very well Tales of Odelon (talk) 14:18, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support — A fine example of a rare Medicane article! Well-structured and adhering to the Manual of Style, I can't really see a reason to not support this. Good job on this one and good luck on future endeavours! - CyclonicWrath765 (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
1899 Red October typhoon (ATPC)[]
Voting[]
- Support — A fairly rare example of a well-prepared and reasonably detailed pre-satellite era tropical cyclone article, I'm pretty inclined to support this one as I don't see any major issues. Good job on this one and good luck on future endeavours! - CyclonicWrath765 (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support — As CW said, a well put together article of a pre-satellite era tropical cyclone! Absolutely no reason not to support this, well done! - Foxthehurricane Sixty-Five (Talk🌀Contributions) 22:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Cyclone Maipelo[]
Voting[]
- Neutral, leaning support — A nicely-detailed article. The formatting is a tiny bit chaotic, what with the images scattered the way they are. Additionally, there could theoretically be a bit more in the preparations and impacts section (considering the storm's severe impacts) and you could even split it into 2 individual sections. Overall, I'm pretty inclined to support this one despite the few areas that could be improved upon, so I will be giving this one a borderline-support. Good job on this one and good luck on future endeavours! - CyclonicWrath765 (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support — What a well written, highly detailed article! This article shows off great meteorological knowledge and feels a lot like a true wikipedia article. Well done! - Foxthehurricane Sixty-Five (Talk🌀Contributions) 21:50, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Typhoon Tokage (2028)[]
Voting[]
- Support — Another great article packed with detail and well written from top to bottom. I support this for all the same reasons I do Maipelo. The mapping of forecast models and warning signals in the article are extremely impressive, something I would have trouble doing myself. Fantastic job on this! -Foxthehurricane Sixty-Five (Talk🌀Contributions) 22:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)